zalatany pisze:Antybiotyk podaje się w celu uniknięcia zakażeń związanych z tak częstym u zwierząt zabrudzeniem czy wręcz uszkodzeniem rany pooperacyjnej.
Nie sadze. A wiesz chociazby dlaczego tak uwazam. Z obserwacji, z obserwacji zwierzat, ktore przebywaja w schroniskach i zapewniam Ciebie, ze po zabiegach nie przebywaja w warunkach 'klinika California no.1'. Wiele z tych zwierzat, po wybudzeniu jest poprostu wypuszczana do swojego stada, boksu itd. Tam nawet nie ma kto i jak dbac o to czy brzuchem nie beda lezaly na golej ziemi-wiesz ile jest problemow pooperacyjnych-wlasciwie zero.
Szkoda, ze nie masz takiej mozliwosci aby to poobserwowac, naprawde polecam-szczegolnie przytuliska prywatne,z psami.
I nikt tam tez nie podaje antybiotyku przed zabiegiem, czy tez dozylnie.
I jesli ktoś nie stosuje antybiotyku, to nie mozna uważać tego za beztroskę i błąd, takie postępowanie jest właśnie zgodne z zaleceniami.
Perioperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium 2003
Lauren A. Trepanier, DVM, PhD, Dip ACVIM, Dip ACVCP
Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, WI, USA
Antimicrobial prophylaxis is indicated for some types of surgical procedures and in patients with certain risk factors for infection. In other situations, perioperative antimicrobials are not rational, and only add to the cost of hospitalization, may lead to adverse reactions or drug interactions, and can encourage the selection of resistant bacteria in an individual patient or on a hospital-wide basis.
1. Cases that DO NOT need antimicrobials
a. Patients undergoing uncontaminated, short surgical procedures
i. e.g., neutering, ovariohysterectomy, skin mass removal
ii. if less than an hour in duration, these cases do not require prophylactic antimicrobials.
Infection Rates In Surgical Procedures: A Comparison Of Cefalexin vs. A Placebo
Vet Comp Ortho Trauma 14[3]:146-150 Aug'01 Original Research 32 Refs
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in small animal surgery. Three hundred and twenty-nine dogs and 544 cats were included in a prospective, randomised, blind trial to determine the frequency of wound infection after clean and clean-contaminated surgical procedures. The animals were allocated to one of two groups: group A received a placebo and group B received cefalexin. The infection rate was measured in each group and correlated with different criteria (age, duration and type of the operation, anaesthetic and Altemeier's class, surgeon's experience). Globally, seventy-eight cases of infection were noted (8.9%). The infection rates in the two groups were not significantly different (9.4% in group A and 8.5% in group B). Infection rate was not affected by the different criteria studied. However, the percentage of animals infected in group B tended to be lower than that of group A as the surgeons' experience increased.
Infection rates in clean surgical procedures: a comparison of ampicillin prophylaxis vs a placebo.
Vasseur PB, Paul HA, Enos LR, Hirsh DC.
A total of 122 dogs and 7 cats were included in a prospective, randomized, blind trial to determine the frequency of wound infection after clean surgical procedures and to compare the infection rates in dogs and cats given ampicillin (group 1) with those given a placebo (group 2). The 2 groups were similar in terms of mean age, sex ratio, duration of hospital stay, and types of surgical procedures. A wound infection developed in one of the dogs given ampicillin; there were no wound infections in the animals given the placebo. The infection rates in the 2 groups were not significantly different.
Co do dożylnego podawania antybiotyków - w ten sposób można podawać stosunkowo wąską grupę, dość kosztownych zresztą antybiotyków. Ich podanie wiąże się ze sporym ryzykiem wywołania wstrząsu

A przeciez na poczatku dyskusji zaczelismy o.... testowaniu na zwierzetach.......[/quote]